What are you looking for?

Funding sources and mechanisms

Funding sources and mechanisms

International climate finance is channeled through various sources, instruments, and mechanisms. Multilateral climate funds play a crucial role in supporting countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, adapt to a changing climate, and build resilient, sustainable economies. However, processes to access funding from these funds differ very much and are complex. Each fund has a unique focus, governance structure, and set of access requirements.

This section provides an overview of the main multilateral climate funds, relevant publications and tools as well as trainings.

Green Climate Fund (GCF)

The GCF was established 2010 as an operating entity of the Financial Mechanism of the UNFCCC. It is the world’s largest climate fund. 

Its mandate is to support developing countries in implementing and enhancing their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and in pursuing low-emission, climate-resilient development pathways. The GCF aims for a 50:50 balance in allocating its grant-equivalent resources between mitigation and adaptation over time, with at least 50 percent of the adaptation funding directed toward particlarly SIDS, LDCs, and African countries.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION
Regular Funding
SIMPLIFIED approval process (sap)
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Large: above US$ 250 million
  • Medium: above US$ 50 million and up to and including US$ 250 million
  • Small: above US$ 10 million and up to and including US$ 50 million
  • Micro: up to and including US$ 10 million

Criteria: 

  • Up to USD 25 million
  • For small-scale, low-risk projects with a high potential for replication and transformative impact
Access types
  • Direct through:
    1. National Accredited Entities
    2. Regional Accredited Entities
  • International through International Accredited Entities
  • Project-specific Assessment Approach (PSAA)
Additional Support
  • Project Preparation Facility (PPF): Provides funding to support the design and preparation of high-quality, impactful project proposals.
  • Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme (RPSP): Supports countries (especially Direct Access Entities) in building capacity to access and effectively use GCF finance, and to strengthen their national climate planning.
  • Private Sector Facility (PSF): Dedicated division designed to fund and mobilise private sector actors, including institutional investors, project sponsors and financial institutions.

Green Climate Fund (GCF)

The GCF was established 2010 as an operating entity of the Financial Mechanism of the UNFCCC and is the world’s largest climate fund. Its mandate is to support developing countries to raise and realize their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) ambitions towards low-emissions, climate-resilient pathways. The GCF aims for a 50:50 balance in allocating its resources between mitigation and adaptation over time and for a floor of 50% of the adaptation allocation for particularly vulnerable countries.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Large: above US$ 250 million
  • Medium: above US$ 50 million and up to and including US$ 250 million
  • Small: above US$ 10 million and up to and including US$ 50 million
  • Micro: up to and including US$ 10 million
Access types
  • Direct through:
    1. National Accredited Entities
    2. Regional Accredited Entities
  • International through International Accredited Entities
  • Project-specific Assessment Approach (PSAA)
Additional Support
  • Project Preparation Facility (PPF): Provides funding to support the design and preparation of high-quality, impactful project proposals.
  • Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme (RPSP): Supports countries (especially Direct Access Entities) in building capacity to access and effectively use GCF finance, and to strengthen their national climate planning.
  • Private Sector Facility (PSF): Dedicated division designed to fund and mobilise private sector actors, including institutional investors, project sponsors and financial institutions.
FUNDING modalities

Criteria: 

  • Up to USD 25 million
  • For small-scale, low-risk projects with a high potential for replication and transformative impact
Access types
  • Direct through:
    1. National Accredited Entities
    2. Regional Accredited Entities
  • International through International Accredited Entities
  • Project-specific Assessment Approach (PSAA)
Additional Support
  • Project Preparation Facility (PPF): Provides funding to support the design and preparation of high-quality, impactful project proposals.
  • Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme (RPSP): Supports countries (especially Direct Access Entities) in building capacity to access and effectively use GCF finance, and to strengthen their national climate planning.
  • Private Sector Facility (PSF): Dedicated division designed to fund and mobilise private sector actors, including institutional investors, project sponsors and financial institutions.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) supports developing countries in raising and implementing their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), promoting low-emission and climate-resilient development pathways. It aims to deliver impact across eight result areas, covering both mitigation and adaptation

The GCF supports projects in both public and private sectors, mobilizing public finance and private investment across the following thematic areas:

Adaptation:

  • Health, food, and water security
  • Livelihoods of people and communities
  • Infrastructure and built environment
  • Ecosystem and ecosystem services

Mitigation:

  • Energy generation and access
  • Transport
  • Building, cities, industries, and appliances
  • Forests and land use 

The GCF classifies proposals by four different project sizes (including GCF funding and co-finance):

  • Micro (≤ US$ 10 million):
    Targeted at small-scale or pilot initiatives, often community-level projects (e.g., off-grid renewable energy, local climate resilience).
  • Small (> US$ 10m–≤ US$ 50 million):
    Often covers regional interventions or larger national pilots (e.g., coastal zone adaptation, forest management programmes).
  • Medium (> US$ 50m–≤ US$ 250 million):
    Complex multi-sector national projects or major infrastructure (e.g., urban transport systems, grid-scale renewables).
  • Large (> US$ 250 million):
    Rare, transformative programmes across multiple sectors with high financial risk and global mitigation/adaptation impacts (e.g., nationwide energy or resilience platforms).

Furthermore, the Simplified Approval Process (SAP) is available for projects with a maximum size of GCF contribution of US$ 25 million and the Project-specific Assessment Approach (PSSA) can be applied to projects of any size (micro to large), without a fixed funding cap, as it allows entities to be assessed for a single project.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) offers two main approaches of access to its resources: (1) Institutional Accreditation and (2) Project-Specific Assessment Approach (PSAA).

1. Institutional Accreditation

Under this approach, entities must be accredited to the GCF. There are two access modalities.

Direct access: National and regional accredited entities can directly access GCF funding and manage projects throughout their lifecycle, from design to implementation and monitoring. This approach supports strengthening local capacities and builds on national expertise. A full list of accredited entities is available in the GCF directory

International access: Developing countries can also access GCF funding through international accredited entities. This is particularly useful where national institutions do not yet have the capacity to manage GCF funds directly. A full list of international accredited entitites is available in ther GCF directory.

2. Project-Specific Assessment Approach (PSAA)

The PSAA allows entities that are not accredited to the GCF to submit project proposals. To qualify, entities must meet specific criteria. Each entity can have a maximum of one approved funding proposal under this approach.

More information on eligibility and requirements is available in the Project-Specific Assessment Approach (PSAA) guidelines.

All developing country Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are eligible to receive resources from the GCF. A full list of eligible countries is available in the Non-Annex I Parties to the Convention.

  • Grants
  • Loans (concessional and market-rate)
  • Guarantees 
  • Equity

The GCF has developed two main instruments to provide support for countries and entities to access climate finance.

1. Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme (RPSP)

The Readiness Programme strengthens the capacity of developing countries to access the GCF and develop country-driven programmes and projects.

Support focuses on:

  • National Designated Authorities (NDAs) and Focal Points
  • Direct Access Entities (DAEs)
  • Preparatory activities, including technical assistance for concept notes and funding proposals

The programme is available to all developing country Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Learn more about the Readiness Programme.

2. Project Preparation Facility (PPF)

The Project Preparation Facility supports the development of funding proposals for the GCF, particularly for Direct Access Entities and micro-to small-scale projects.

Support is provided for the preparation of a full funding proposal package based on an approved Concept Note. This includes activities across all stages of project development, from initial design to detailed planning, as well as the preparation of required supporting documents (e.g. pre-feasibility and feasibility studies).

Up to USD 1.5 million can be requested per proposal, subject to justification.

Support is available through two modalities:

  • PPF funding: Accredited Entities (AEs) receive financial support (grants, repayable grants, or equity) to undertake project preparation activities. Requests up to USD 300,000 may qualify for a simplified approval process. In general, if a PPF results in a feasible project with income generation potential, the PPF amount financed by the GCF should be repayable at financial close of the funded activity.
  • PPF service: The GCF provides project preparation services directly to AEs through a roster of external independent consultancy firms.

To access the PPF, AEs must submit a Concept Note (prior submission is recommended) either before or together with a PPF application. Once the Concept Note is cleared, the PPF application is reviewed and approved by the GCF Secretariat.

Learn more about the Project Preparation Facility.

Concept note development (voluntary)
Concept note development (voluntary)

Description:

Concept notes present a summary of a proposed project/programme and offer an opportunity to get feedback from the GCF Secretariat. Although voluntary, it is highly encouraged.

If support through the Project Preparation Facility (PPF) is requested, submission of a concept note is mandatory.

Following the submission by the NDA/AE, the GCF Secretariat screens and provides feedback. This early feedback helps proponents focus on proposals with higher chances of success.

Actors involved: 

NDA/Focal Points, Accredited Entity (AE), GCF Secretariat

1
Concept note development (voluntary)
Funding Proposal development
Funding Proposal development

Description:

Funding proposals must follow the GCF investment framework and results management framework. The AE must show how the project will deliver climate mitigation and/or adaptation results. The AE is responsible for first-level due diligence and must assess whether the project is technically, financially, economically, environmentally, and socially sound. The proposal must also be cost-effective and fall within the AE’s accreditation scope.

Actors involved: 

AE

Funding Proposal template | Green Climate Fund

2
Funding Proposal development
Funding proposal submission
Funding proposal submission

Description:

Funding proposals must be submitted through the GCF Partner Portal. They must include no-objection letters from the respective NDA or focal point, confirming that the project is country-driven and aligned with national climate strategies and plans. The proposal must also explain the implementation arrangements, including the role of Executing Entities.

GCF does not enter into a direct contractual relationship with Executing Entities.

5
Funding proposal submission
Initial review
Initial review

Description:

After submission, the GCF Secretariat conducts an initial review and completeness check. The Secretariat checks whether the proposal meets basic requirements before it moves further in the appraisal process. Project activities are also disclosed to stakeholders in line with GCF’s Information Disclosure Policy.

Actors involved: 

GCF Secretariat

6
Initial review
Technical review
Technical review

Description:

The independent Technical Advisory Panel (iTAP) assesses the performance of the FP against six GCF activity-specific criteria, exchanges with AE doing the review process and subsequently submits its assessment to the Board, recommending whether to endorse, endorse with conditions, or not endorse the proposal.

Actors involved: 

iTAP

7
Technical review
Submission of FP package to the Board
Submission of FP package to the Board

Description:

Once the independent iTAP assessment is completed, the Secretariat compiles the full funding proposal package. The package is shared with the GCF Board and published on the GCF website. The Accredited Entity must confirm disclosure of the information included in the funding proposal. Funding proposal packages are submitted to the Board at least 21 days before the Board meeting

Actors involved: 

GCF Secretariat

8
Submission of FP package to the Board
Review by the Board
Review by the Board

Description:

Board members review the funding proposal package before the meeting. They may ask questions or request clarifications through a dedicated question-and-answer platform or email account. The Secretariat compiles these questions and forwards them to the AE.

Actors involved: 

Board

GCF Secretariat

9
Review by the Board
Response by the AE
Response by the AE

Description:

The AE is given one week to provide written responses to Board questions. These responses are compiled and shared with the Board before the meeting. The AE may also be asked to attend a consultation or information day before the Board meeting to respond to questions from Board advisers or civil society organisations

Actors involved: 

AE

10
Response by the AE
Board approval
Board approval

Description:

Funding proposals are considered as an agenda item during the Board meeting. A representative from the AE is expected to attend, together with the relevant Task Manager and iTAP member. They may be asked to respond to questions from Board members and active observers. If the proposal is approved, the Secretariat informs the AE and the NDA or focal point of the Board’s decision and any approval conditions. If rejected, NDAs may request reconsideration through the Independent Redress Mechanism.

Actors involved: 

Board

AE

iTAP

11
Board approval

Different portals provide a good overview on ongoing and past projects of the respective fund. 

National Designated Authorities | Green Climate Fund: National Focal Points for the multilateral climate funds.

Adaptation Fund (AF)

The Adaptation Fund is the largest global climate fund focusing solely on adaptation and was established in 2001. It finances concrete adaptation projects and programmes in developing countries that are parties to the Kyoto Protocol or the Paris Agreement and are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
ADAPTATION
Regular Projects & Programmes
LOCALLY-LED ADAPTATION (LLA)
innovation projects
LEARNING​
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Single-country (NIE, RIE, MIE): < USD 25 million per Project/Programme (within USD 40 million country cap)
  • Regional (RIE, MIE) : < USD 30 million per Project/Programme
  • Project Scale-Up Grant (NIE): < USD 100,000 per grant

Funding Sizes: 

  • Single-country (NIE, RIE, MIE): < USD 5 million per Project/Programme
  • Regional (RIE, MIE): < USD 30 million per Project/Programme
  • Aggregator (Non-Accredited): < USD 500, 000 per Grantee

Funding Sizes: 

  • Small innovation project – single country (NIE)≤ USD 250,000 per project, up to USD 750,000 with a learning component)
  • Large innovation projects – single country/regional (NIE, MIE, RIE): ≤ USD 5 million per Project/Programme
  • Adaptation Fund Climate Innovation Accelerator – AFCIA (Non-Accredited) ≤ USD 250,000 per Grantee/Innovator (accessible to non-accredited entitites)

Funding Sizes: 

  • Learning (NIE): up to USD 500,000 per grant, up to USD 750,000 when combined with innovation
Access types

Through the following accredited entitites, as indicated above:

  • National Implementing Entities (NIE)
  • Regional Implementing Entities (RIE)
  • Multilateral Implementing Entities (MIE)
Additional Support
  • Readiness Package:
    • Readiness Grants: Support for accreditation of National Implementing Entities (NIEs) (up to USD 150,000 per NIE)
  • Technical Assistance Grants: Environmental & Social Policy + Gender Policy:
    • ESGP: up to USD 25,000 per NIE to strengthen NIE capacity to manage environmental and social risks
    • Gender Policy: up to USD 10,000 per NIE to strengthen NIE capacity to manage gender risks
  • Project Formulation Grant: Supports project preparation and design to strengthen the capacities of NIEs, RIEs, and MIEs (funding amount varies under readiness support envelope)

Adaptation Fund (AF)

The Adaptation Fund is the largest global climate fund focusing solely on adaptation and was established in 2001. It finances concrete adaptation projects and programmes in developing countries that are parties to the Kyoto Protocol or the Paris Agreement and are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
ADAPTATION
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Single-country: < USD 25 million (USD 40 million country cap)
  • Regional: < USD 30 million
Access types
  • Direct through National Implementing Entities (NIE)
  • Regional and multilateral through: 
  1. Regional Implementing Entities (RIE)
  2. Multilateral Implementing Entities (MIE)
Additional Support
  • Readiness package: Support for accreditation of National Implementing Entities (NIES)
  • Project formulation grant: Support project formulation activities to build the capacities of NIEs, RIEs, and MIEs in project preparation and design
  • Technical assistance grant: Readiness support to enhance NIEs capacity to manage environmental and social as well as gender risks
  • Project scale-up grant: Readiness funding to NIES to support planning, design and development of scale-up activities
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Single-country: < USD 5 million
  • Regional: < USD 30 million
Access types
  • Direct through National Implementing Entities (NIE)
  • Regional and multilateral through: 
  1. Regional Implementing Entities (RIE)
  2. Multilateral Implementing Entities (MIE)
Additional Support
  • Readiness package: Support for accreditation of National Implementing Entities (NIES)
  • Project formulation grant: Support project formulation activities to build the capacities of NIEs, RIEs, and MIEs in project preparation and design
  • Technical assistance grant: Readiness support to enhance NIEs capacity to manage environmental and social as well as gender risks
  • Project scale-up grant: Readiness funding to NIES to support planning, design and development of scale-up activities
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Single-country: < USD 250,000
  • Large single country/regional: < USD 5 million
Access types
  • Direct through National Implementing Entities (NIE)
  • Regional and multilateral through: 
  1. Regional Implementing Entities (RIE)
  2. Multilateral Implementing Entities (MIE)
Additional Support
  • Readiness package: Support for accreditation of National Implementing Entities (NIES)
  • Project formulation grant: Support project formulation activities to build the capacities of NIEs, RIEs, and MIEs in project preparation and design
  • Technical assistance grant: Readiness support to enhance NIEs capacity to manage environmental and social as well as gender risks
  • Project scale-up grant: Readiness funding to NIES to support planning, design and development of scale-up activities
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Single-country: < USD 250,000
  • Large single country/regional: < USD 5 million
Access types
  • Direct through National Implementing Entities (NIE)
  • Regional and multilateral through: 
  1. Regional Implementing Entities (RIE)
  2. Multilateral Implementing Entities (MIE)
Additional Support
  • Readiness package: Support for accreditation of National Implementing Entities (NIES)
  • Project formulation grant: Support project formulation activities to build the capacities of NIEs, RIEs, and MIEs in project preparation and design
  • Technical assistance grant: Readiness support to enhance NIEs capacity to manage environmental and social as well as gender risks
  • Project scale-up grant: Readiness funding to NIES to support planning, design and development of scale-up activities

The Adaptation Fund finances projects and programmes that support vulnerable communities in developing countries to adapt to climate change.

Funding is country-driven, meaning that projects are based on national priorities and the needs of the most vulnerable populations.

The Fund does not define fixed priority investment areas. Instead, it supports adaptation actions across a wide range of sectors, depending on country needs. The funded sectors are the following:

  • Agriculture
  • Coastal Zone Management
  • Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Disaster Risk Reduction and early warning systems
  • Ecosystem based Adaptation
  • Food Security
  • Forest
  • Multisector Projects
  • Rural Development
  • Urban Development 
  • Water Management

The AF offers different financing windows:

1.Regular Projects & Programmes (Action)

This is the Adaptation Fund’s main financing window, supporting the implementation of adaptation projects and programmes.

  • Single-country projects/programmes:
    Fund large-scale adaptation actions within one country, addressing national climate risks and priorities.
  • Regional projects/programmes:
    Support adaptation interventions across multiple countries, particularly where climate risks are shared (e.g. ecosystems, river basins).
  • Project Scale-Up Grants:
    Provide preparatory funding to expand successful projects, supporting planning, design, and development of follow-up proposals.

2.Locally-Led Adaptation (LLA)

This window focuses on community-driven adaptation, ensuring that local actors are directly involved.

  • LLA single-country projects/programmes:
    Support locally-led, small-scale adaptation actions within one country, with strong community engagement.
  • LLA regional projects/programmes:
    Enable locally-led approaches across multiple countries, often addressing shared local challenges.

3.Innovation Projects

This window supports new, innovative approaches to adaptation, from early-stage ideas to scaling proven solutions.

  • Small innovation projects (single-country):
    Fund pilot and early-stage ideas to test innovative approaches.
  • Large innovation projects (single-country or regional):
    Support the scaling up of successful innovations with proven potential.
  • Adaptation Fund Climate Innovation Accelerator (AFCIA):
    Provides funding to innovators and non-accredited entities to develop and test new solutions.

4.Learning Grants

This window supports knowledge generation and dissemination.
Fund activities that capture lessons learned, identify best practices, and share knowledge to improve future adaptation efforts and scale impact.

The AF has several different funding windows that differ in size and funding focus, based on the funding contribution by the AF:

Regular projects and programmes (Action):

  • Single-country projects/programmes (up to USD 25 million)
    • Within the USD 40 million country cap
  • Regional projects/programmes (up to USD 30 million)

Locally-Led Adaptation (LLA) projects and programmes:

  • LLA single-country projects/programmes (up to USD 5 million)
  • LLA regional projects/programmes (up to USD 30 million)

Innovation projects:

  • Small single-country projects (up to USD 250,000)
    • Up to USD 750,000 with a learning component
  • Large single-country or regional projects/programmes (up to USD 5 million)
  • Adaptation Fund Climate Innovation Accelerator (AFCIA):
    • Up to USD 250,000 per innovator (non-accredited entities eligible)

Additional support (Readiness & Learning):

  • Readiness Support Package: up to USD 150,000 per NIE
  • Technical Assistance Grants:
    • Up to USD 25,000 (Environmental & Social + Gender)
    • Up to USD 10,000 (Gender only)
  • Learning Grants: up to USD 500,000 (up to USD 750,000 with innovation)
  • Project Scale-Up Grants: up to USD 100,000 (for NIEs, preparatory support only)

Countries access Adaptation Fund resources through accredited implementing entities.

Types of implementing entities:

  • National Implementing Entities (NIEs): Enable direct access to funding by national institutions.

All developing country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol or the Paris Agreement that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effect of climate change are eligible to receive funding from the AF.

  • Grants
  • The AF provides Funding for projects and programmes on a full adaptation cost basis. This means that co-financing is not a pre-requisite to access the Fund’s resources. However, it is possible to implement AF projects in parallel with financing from other sources.

The Adaptation Fund also provides targeted support to strengthen institutional capacity and support project development:

1. Readiness Support:

Supports countries in building the capacity of National Implementing Entities (NIEs), including accreditation, strengthening institutional systems, and developing project pipelines. This includes the Readiness Package Grant and two Technical Assistance Grants.

Find more information on the Adaptation Fund Readiness page. 

2. Project Formulation Grant (PFG)

The Project Formulation Grant (PFG) supports the preparation and design of project and programme proposals under the Adaptation Fund. It strengthens the capacity of accredited Implementing Entities to develop high-quality, evidence-based adaptation projects.

PFGs are not standalone funding. They must be requested at the time of submitting a project concept or pre-concept note under the Adaptation Fund’s project approval process. This means they are accessed during the project development stage, before a fully developed proposal is prepared.

1.What PFGs support

PFGs provide targeted funding for technical and analytical work required to develop strong project proposals. This may include:

  • Feasibility studies and technical analyses
  • Stakeholder consultations and workshops
  • Environmental, social, and gender assessments
  • Risk and vulnerability analyses
  • Development of monitoring and evaluation frameworks
  • Engagement of national or international experts

These activities help ensure that proposals are robust and aligned with the Fund’s Environmental and Social Policy (ESP) and Gender Policy

2. Eligible applicants:

All accredited Implementing Entities (NIEs, RIEs, and MIEs)

3. When to request:

  • At the project concept stage (two-step process) or
  • At the pre-concept stage (three-step process for regional proposals)

4. Access available across funding windows:

Available under Regular (Action), Locally-Led Adaptation (LLA), and Large Innovation funding windows

5. Funding amounts

Funding levels depend on the size and scope of the project:

(a) Single-country projects

  • Below USD 2 million → USD 50,000
  • USD 2–5 million → USD 100,000
  • Above USD 5 million → USD 150,000

(b) Regional projects and programmes:

  • Base amount: USD 150,000 (minimum 2 countries)
    • + USD 15,000 per additional country
  • Maximum USD 250,000

(c) Single country LLA projects:

  • Base: USD 150,000,
  • Additional funding up to USD 100,000 may be provided on a case-by-case basis 

(d) Regional LLA projects

  • Base: USD 165,000 (minimum 3 countries)
    • USD 15,000 per additional country
  • Maximum USD 350,000. An additional of up to USD 100,000 may be provided  on a case-by-case basis

6. How to apply

Complete the Request for Project Formulation Grant (PFG) template. Submit the PFG request together with a project concept (for the two-step process) or pre-concept note (for the optional three-step process used for regional and single-country LLA projects). The request is reviewed as part of the overall project submission process

For regional projects and single-country LLA projects, applicants may follow an optional three-step approach consisting of: Pre-Concept → Concept → Full Proposal. 

Where a PFG is requested at the pre-concept stage, the amount available is capped at 20% of the maximum total PFG applicable to the project.

The PFG request is reviewed as part of the overall project submission process..

7. Review and approval process

The AF operates a rolling submission process, meaning proposals may be submitted at any time. Following submission, the AF Secretariat conducts a technical review and provides feedback within approximately three weeks (except during review intermissions).

If the submission is not cleared, the IE may further develop the proposal in consultation with the Secretariat and resubmit it. If the submission is technically cleared, it proceeds to the AF Board for approval.

Technically cleared proposals are considered by the AF Board during its biannual approval process. The approval process includes preparation and posting of Board documents (approximately three weeks), Board member review (approximately three weeks), a Board meeting (one week), and the Board decision process (one week).

Development of a Project Concept
Development of a Project Concept

Develop a project or programme in line with national priorities, in collaboration with an accredited implementing entity (NIE, RIE, or MIE).

Proposals may follow either a:

  • One-step process: Full Proposal 
  • Two-step process: Concept note → Full proposal
  • Three-step process (optional for regional projects and single-country LLA projects): Pre-concept note → Concept note → Full proposal

 

Applicants must prepare their submission using the relevant Adaptation Fund templates and guidance, including templates for pre-concept notes, concept notes, and fully developed proposals.

1
Development of a Project Concept
Endorsement
Endorsement

Obtain a letter of endorsement from the Designated Authority (DA) confirming the project aligns with national priorities.

2
Endorsement
Submission of proposal
Submission of proposal

Submit the proposal (concept note or full proposal) to the Adaptation Fund Secretariat through the implementing entity.

Submissions are accepted on a rolling basis.

3
Submission of proposal
Technical Review and Revision
Technical Review and Revision

The Secretariat reviews the proposal and provides feedback, typically within a few weeks. 

The review process is iterative, with the Secretariat providing feedback and the Implementing Entity revising and resubmitting the proposal until it is technically cleared. Proposals can be submitted on a rolling basis throughout the year

4
Technical Review and Revision
Review Intermission
Review Intermission

The Adaptation Fund operates review intermissions prior to Board meetings. During these periods, technical reviews are paused while technically cleared proposals are prepared for Board consideration.

5
Review Intermission
Board approval
Board approval

Once technically cleared, the proposal is submitted to the Adaptation Fund Board for approval.

Technically cleared proposals are considered during the Board's biannual approval process. Prior to the Board meeting, proposals undergo document preparation, publication, and Board member review before a final funding decision is made.

6
Board approval

Different portals provide a good overview on ongoing and past projects of the respective fund. 

Designated Authorities: National Focal Points for the AF.

Global Environment Facility Trust Fund (GEF TF)

The Global Environment Facility (GEF) is a family of funds for climate and the environment. It provides funding to support developing countries in meeting the objectives of international environmental conventions. It has served as an operating entity of the financial mechanism of UNFCCC since the Convention’s entry into force in 1994. 

In addition to the UNFCCC, the GEF serves five other conventions: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Minamata Convention on Mercury, and the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement.

The GEF Trust Fund, as the largest fund under the GEF, focuses on biodiversity, chemicals and waste, climate change, international waters, and land degradation.

The GEF finances projects for mitigation and adaptation, as well as for the preparation of national communications in non-Annex I Parties to the Convention and other enabling activities.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Main focus on Mitigation but also addressing Adaptation
Regular Funding
Program
ENABLING ACTIVITY (EA)
SMALL GRANTS PROGRAMME (SGP)
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Full-sized: > USD 5 million
  • Medium-sized: < USD 5
    million

A longer-term and strategic arrangement of individual yet interlinked projects (child projects) that aim at achieving large-scale impacts on the global environment.

A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention.

Programme implemented by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), and Conservation International (CI).
Funding sizes:
Up to USD 75,000 for USD 150,000 for strategic projects)

Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
  • Direct access through countries for EAs up to USD 500,000
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies
  • Provides grants directly to NGOS, CBOS, Indigenous Peoples organizations, women and youth groups, persons with disabilities, as well as rural communities
Additional Support
  • Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT): Provides financial and technical support to developing countries to meet the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) requirements of the Paris Agreement, focusing on strengthening Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) systems.
  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Funding provided to support preparation of a full-sized project (FSP) or medium- sized project (MSP). The amount of PPG that can be requested is proportional to the size of the project.
  • Planning grants of up to USD 5,000

Global Environment Facility Trust Fund (GEF TF)

The Global Environment Facility (GEF) is a family of funds for climate and the environment. It provides funding to assist developing countries in meeting the objectives of international environmental conventions. It has served as an operating entity of the financial mechanism of UNFCCC since the Convention’s entry into force in 1994. Besides the UNFCCC, the GEF serves five other conventions: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Minamata Convention on Mercury, and the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Main focus on Mitigation but also addressing Adaptation
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Full-sized: > USD 5 million
  • Medium-sized: < USD 5
    million
Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
Additional Support
  • Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT): Provides financial and technical support to developing countries to meet the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) requirements of the Paris Agreement, focusing on strengthening Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) systems.
  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Funding provided to support preparation of a full-sized project (FSP) or medium- sized project (MSP). The amount of PPG that can be requested is proportional to the size of the project.
FUNDING modalities

A longer-term and strategic arrangement of individual yet interlinked projects (child projects) that aim at achieving large-scale impacts on the global environment.

Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
Additional Support
  • Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT): Provides financial and technical support to developing countries to meet the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) requirements of the Paris Agreement, focusing on strengthening Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) systems.
  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Funding provided to support preparation of a full-sized project (FSP) or medium- sized project (MSP). The amount of PPG that can be requested is proportional to the size of the project.
FUNDING modalities

A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention.

Access types
  • Direct access through countries for EAs up to USD 500,000
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies
Additional Support
  • Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT): Provides financial and technical support to developing countries to meet the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) requirements of the Paris Agreement, focusing on strengthening Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) systems.
  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Funding provided to support preparation of a full-sized project (FSP) or medium- sized project (MSP). The amount of PPG that can be requested is proportional to the size of the project.
FUNDING modalities

Programme implemented by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), and Conservation International (CI).
Funding sizes:
Up to USD 75,000 for USD 150,000 for strategic projects)

Access types
  • Provides grants directly to NGOS, CBOS, Indigenous Peoples organizations, women and youth groups, persons with disabilities, as well as rural communities
Additional Support
  • Planning grants of up to USD 5,000

The GEF TF provides funding to developing countries and countries with economies in transition to meet the objectives of international environmental conventions and agreements. Its focal areas include:

  • Biodiversity
  • Climate Change
  • Land Degradation
  • International Waters
  • Chemicals and Waste

With respect to climate change, the GEF TF supports climate change mitigation projects that reduce or avoid greenhouse gas emissions in the areas of renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable transport, and management of land use, land-use change, and forestry. It also supports the ability of developing countries to enhance climate resilience by promoting short and long-term policies, plans, programmes, projects and actions on adaptation. 

The GEF Trust Fund differentiates between two sizes for regular projects, based on the contribution of the fund:

  • Full-sized projects (> USD 5 million)
  • Medium-sized projects (≤ USD 5 million)

In addition, the GEF TF provides funding through other modalities:

  • Enabling Activity (EA): A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention.
  • Program: A longer-term and strategic arrangement of individual yet interlinked projects (child projects) that aim at achieving large-scale impacts on the global environment.
  • Non-Grant Instrument: Financial instruments such as loans, guarantees, or equity to support project implementation.
  • Small Grants Program (SGP): For community-based projects, providing grants of up to USD 75,000 (or USD 150,000 for strategic projects).

Funding is allocated to countries through the System for Transparent Allocation of Resources (STAR), a performance-based framework that assigns country shares based on weighted indices.

This applies only to the focal areas of Climate Change, Biodiversity, and Land Degradation. For International Waters and Chemicals and Waste, funding is allocated through a competitive, project-based process.

Access to the GEF TF is mainly through one of the 18 GEF Agencies, which support the development and implementation of projects.

Support for Enabling Activities (EA) may also be accessed directly, for amounts of up to USD 500,000. In addition, the Small Grants Programme (SGP) provides funding directly to NGOs, community-based organizations, Indigenous Peoples organizations, women and youth groups, persons with disabilities, and rural communities through partner agencies such as UNDP, FAO, and CI.

All developing country Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are eligible to receive resources from the GET TF. A full list of eligible countries is available in the Non-Annex I Parties to the Convention.

  • Grants
  • Non-grant instruments (via NGI window): guarantees, equity, concessional loans, and other structured/contingent instruments

The Global Environment Facility provides additional support for project preparation and for supporting countries in fulfilling commitments under international conventions.

  • Enabling activity:  A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention. It can be directly accessed by countries if request is up to 500,000 USD.
  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Supports the development and design of full project proposals, requested by GEF Agencies during project preparation.
  • Capacity-building support: Includes support to GEF focal points and national stakeholders, including through the Country Engagement Strategy, to strengthen coordination and implementation.
  • Small Grants Programme (SGP): Provides grants to local communities, CSOs, Indigenous Peoples, and youth-led organisations for community-based environmental and climate action.

Process for accessing GEF, LDCF, and SCCF funding: Projects are developed and submitted by accredited GEF Agencies in consultation with recipient countries, following a common GEF project cycle.

For medium-sized projects, the GEF Agency may choose between a one-step or two-step approval process, while full-sized projects (FSPs) follow a two-step process involving Council approval and CEO endorsement.

Development of a Project Concept
Development of a Project Concept (Two-step approach)

Description:

A GEF Agency prepares a project concept at the request of and in consultation with relevant country institutions and other relevant partners using the Project Identification Form (PIF)

Actors involved:

GEF Agency

1
Development of a Project Concept
Submission of PIF to the GEF Secretariat
Submission of PIF to the GEF Secretariat (Two-step approach)

Description:

The Agency submits PIFs to the Secretariat on a rolling basis, copying other Agencies, STAP, and the relevant Convention Secretariats.

A letter of Endorsement by the respective GEF Operational Focal Point has to be attached.

Actors involved: 

GEF Agency

GEF Operational Focal Point

2
Submission of PIF to the GEF Secretariat
Review of the PIF
Review of the PIF (Two-step approach)

Description:

Secretariat reviews each eligible PIF. Other Agencies and Convention Secretariats submit any comments to the Secretariat and the Agency. If a PIF does not meet the conditions for approval, the Secretariat either rejects it or requests additional information

Actors involved: 

GEF Secretariat

3
Review of the PIF
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF (Two-step approach)

Description:

Following receipt of the Secretariat’s comments, the Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF, if necessary

Actors involved: 

GEF Agency

4
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF
Approval by the CEO
Approval by the CEO (Two-step approach)

Description:

Once the Secretariat determines that the project proposal meets the conditions for approval, the CEO decides whether to include it in a Work Program

Actors involved:

GEF CEO

GEF Secretariat STAP 

5
Approval by the CEO
Development of a MSP Approval Request
Development of a MSP Approval Request

Two-step approach: After PIF approval, and before the deadline for submission of a complete approval request, the Agency prepares and

One-step approach: A GEF Agency prepares a MSP Approval Request at the request of and in consultation with relevant country institutions and other relevant partners.

Actors involved:

GEF Agency

6
Development of a MSP Approval Request
Submission of the MSP
Submission of the MSP

Two-step approach: The Agency submits the MSP Approval Request to the Secretariat for review on a rolling basis. A letter of Endorsement by the respective GEF Operational Focal Point has to be attached.

One-step approach: The Agency submits MSP Approval Request to the Secretariat on a rolling basis. A letter of Endorsement by the respective GEF Operational Focal Point has to be attached.

Actors involved: 

GEF Council

7
Submission of the MSP
Review of the MSP
Review of the MSP

Two-step approach: The Secretariat reviews the MSP Approval Request for consistency with the approved PIF

One-step approach: The Secretariat reviews the MSP Approval Request. If a MSP Approval Request does not meet the conditions for approval, the Secretariat either rejects it or requests additional information.

Actors involved: 

GEF Secretariat

8
Review of the MSP
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP

Description:

Following receipt of the Secretariat’s comments, the Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP Approval Request, if necessary

Actors involved: 

GEF Agency

9
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP
CEO Approval
CEO Approval

Description:

Once the Secretariat determines that a project proposal meets the conditions for approval, the GEF CEO decides whether to approve the MSP.

Actors involved: 

GEF CEO

10
CEO Approval
Approval by the Agency
Approval by the Agency

Description:

The Agency approves the project following its own internal procedures and begins project implementation.

Actors involved:

GEF Agency

11
Approval by the Agency

Different portals provide a good overview on ongoing and past projects of the respective fund. 

Focal Points | GEF : National Focal Points for the GEF TF.

Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF)

The LDCF was set up in 2001 by the UNFCCC as the only multilateral climate fund exclusively dedicated to helping Least Developed Countries (LDCs) to adapt to climate change and is part of the GEF achitecture.

While it was initially mandated to finance the preparation and implementation of National Adaptation Programs of Action (NAPAs) as well as other components of the LDC work programme, it has been tasked, in 2011, to also provide resources to assist LDC Parties in preparing for the national adaptation plan process.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Adaptation
Regular Funding
Program
ENABLING ACTIVITY (EA)
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Full-sized: > USD 5 million
  • Medium-sized: < USD 5 million
    A country cap is set at USD 20 million for a programming cycle

A longer-term and strategic arrangement of individual yet interlinked projects (child projects) that aim at achieving large-scale impacts on the global environment.

A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention.

Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
  • Direct access through countries for EAs up to USD 500,000
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies
Additional Support
  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Supports the development and design of project proposals.
  • Regional and global initiatives: Support activities and programmes at the regional and global level, including knowledge sharing and innovation.
  • Capacity-building support: Strengthens national institutions, focal points, and stakeholders, including through the Country Engagement Strategy and dedicated capacity-building programmes.

Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF)

The LDCF was set up in 2001 by the UNFCCC as the only multilateral climate fund exclusively dedicated to helping Least Developed Countries (LDCs) to adapt to climate change. It is managed by the GEF and was initially mandated to finance the preparation and implementation of National Adaptation Programs of Action (NAPAs) as well as other components of the LDC work programme, it has been tasked, in 2011, to also provide resources to assist LDC Parties in preparing for the national adaptation plan process.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Adaptation
FUNDING modalities

Funding Sizes: 

  • Full-sized: > USD 5 million
  • Medium-sized: < USD 5 million
    A country cap is set at USD 20 million for a programming cycle
Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
Additional Support
  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Funding provided to support
    preparation of a full-sized project (FSP) or medium-sized project (MSP). The amount of PPG that can be requested is proportional to the size of the project
FUNDING modalities

A longer-term and strategic arrangement of individual yet interlinked projects (child projects) that aim at achieving large-scale impacts on the global environment.

Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
FUNDING modalities

A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention.

Access types
  • Direct access through countries for EAs up to USD 500,000
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies

The LDCF supports Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in addressing their most urgent and long-term adaptation needs under the UNFCCC, including through the implementation of National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs), National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), and the LDC Work Programme.

Programming under the LDCF is guided by the GEF adaptation strategy for the LDCF/SCCF, in line with UNFCCC COP guidance.

The GEF-9 adaptation strategy for the LDCF/SCCF focuses on:

  • Agriculture and food systems,
  • Water security and sustainable management,
  • Nature-based solutions and infrastructure.

Health systems resilience, climate information services and early warning systems are integrated as critical enabling foundations.

Implementation approaches:

  • Policy integration and country leadership
  • Adaptive social protection
  • Partnerships with MDBs and IFIs
  • Innovative finance and market development

Cross-cutting approaches include whole-of-society engagement and fragility-sensitive programming, which are integrated across all areas of support.

The LDCF differentiates between two sizes for projects, based on the contribution of the fund:

  • Full-sized projects (> USD 5 million)
  • Medium-sized projects (≤ USD 5 million)

A country cap of USD 20 million is set for a programming cycle (under the USD 1 billion scenario; increasing to USD 25 million under a USD 1.3 billion scenario).

In addition, the LDCF provides funding through other modalities:

  • Enabling Activity (EA): A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention.
  • Program: A longer-term and strategic arrangement of individual yet interlinked projects (child projects) that aim at achieving large-scale impacts on the global environment.

Additional funding beyond country caps is available through LDCF programs, including:

  • Challenge Program for Adaptation Innovation in LDCs (innovation & private sector engagement)
  • Global and regional initiatives (e.g. enabling activities and Convention support)

Access to the LDCF is through one of the 18 GEF Agencies. The support for Enabling Activities (EA) is also possible through direct access, if the amount is up to USD 500,000. 

All LDCs that are Parties to the UNFCCC have access to the LDCF, as reflected in the list of Non-Annex I Parties to the Convention and the list of Least Developed Countries (LDCs).

  • Grants

The LDCF and SCCF provide additional support to prepare projects, strengthen capacity, and support countries in implementing adaptation priorities under the UNFCCC.

  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Supports the development and design of project proposals.
  • Enabling Activities (EA): Support the preparation of plans, strategies, and reports (e.g. NAPAs, NAPs) to fulfill Convention commitments.
  • Regional and global initiatives: Support activities and programmes at the regional and global level, including knowledge sharing and innovation.
  • Capacity-building support: Strengthens national institutions, focal points, and stakeholders, including through the Country Engagement Strategy and dedicated capacity-building programmes.

Eligibility:

  • LDCF: Available to Least Developed Countries only
  • SCCF: Available to all developing countries, with a focus on technology and innovation

Process for accessing GEF, LDCF, and SCCF funding: Projects are developed and submitted by accredited GEF Agencies in consultation with recipient countries, following a common GEF project cycle.

For medium-sized projects, the GEF Agency may choose between a one-step or two-step approval process, while full-sized projects (FSPs) follow a two-step process involving Council approval and CEO endorsement.

Development of a Project Concept
Development of a Project Concept (Two-step approach)

Description:

A GEF Agency prepares a project concept at the request of and in consultation with relevant country institutions and other relevant partners using the Project Identification Form (PIF)

Actors involved:

GEF Agency

1
Development of a Project Concept
Submission of PIF to the GEF Secretariat
Submission of PIF to the GEF Secretariat (Two-step approach)

Description:

The Agency submits PIFs to the Secretariat on a rolling basis, copying other Agencies, STAP, and the relevant Convention Secretariats.

A letter of Endorsement by the respective GEF Operational Focal Point has to be attached.

Actors involved: 

GEF Agency

GEF Operational Focal Point

2
Submission of PIF to the GEF Secretariat
Review of the PIF
Review of the PIF (Two-step approach)

Description:

Secretariat reviews each eligible PIF. Other Agencies and Convention Secretariats submit any comments to the Secretariat and the Agency. If a PIF does not meet the conditions for approval, the Secretariat either rejects it or requests additional information

Actors involved: 

GEF Secretariat

3
Review of the PIF
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF (Two-step approach)

Description:

Following receipt of the Secretariat’s comments, the Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF, if necessary

Actors involved: 

GEF Agency

4
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF
Approval by the CEO
Approval by the CEO (Two-step approach)

Description:

Once the Secretariat determines that the project proposal meets the conditions for approval, the CEO decides whether to include it in a Work Program

Actors involved:

GEF CEO

GEF Secretariat STAP 

5
Approval by the CEO
Development of a MSP Approval Request
Development of a MSP Approval Request

Two-step approach: After PIF approval, and before the deadline for submission of a complete approval request, the Agency prepares and

One-step approach: A GEF Agency prepares a MSP Approval Request at the request of and in consultation with relevant country institutions and other relevant partners.

Actors involved:

GEF Agency

6
Development of a MSP Approval Request
Submission of the MSP
Submission of the MSP

Two-step approach: The Agency submits the MSP Approval Request to the Secretariat for review on a rolling basis. A letter of Endorsement by the respective GEF Operational Focal Point has to be attached.

One-step approach: The Agency submits MSP Approval Request to the Secretariat on a rolling basis. A letter of Endorsement by the respective GEF Operational Focal Point has to be attached.

Actors involved: 

GEF Council

7
Submission of the MSP
Review of the MSP
Review of the MSP

Two-step approach: The Secretariat reviews the MSP Approval Request for consistency with the approved PIF

One-step approach: The Secretariat reviews the MSP Approval Request. If a MSP Approval Request does not meet the conditions for approval, the Secretariat either rejects it or requests additional information.

Actors involved: 

GEF Secretariat

8
Review of the MSP
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP

Description:

Following receipt of the Secretariat’s comments, the Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP Approval Request, if necessary

Actors involved: 

GEF Agency

9
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP
CEO Approval
CEO Approval

Description:

Once the Secretariat determines that a project proposal meets the conditions for approval, the GEF CEO decides whether to approve the MSP.

Actors involved: 

GEF CEO

10
CEO Approval
Approval by the Agency
Approval by the Agency

Description:

The Agency approves the project following its own internal procedures and begins project implementation.

Actors involved:

GEF Agency

11
Approval by the Agency

Different portals provide a good overview on ongoing and past projects of the respective fund. 

  • Projects: List of GEF, LDCF and SCCF projects

Focal Points | GEF : National Focal Points for GEF is also responsible for LDCF and SCCF.

Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF)

The SCCF was established under the Convention in 2001 to finance activities, programs, and measures that help vulnerable developing countries (particularly the most vulnerable in Africa, Asia and the Small Island Developing States) to address the negative impacts of climate change. Since 2011, the SCCF has been tasked to provide resources to assist developing country Parties that are not least developed country Parties with their country-driven processes to advance NAPs

The SCCF supports in the following two priority areas:

  • Supporting the adaptation needs of Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
  • Strengthening technology transfer, innovation, and private sector engagement
CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Adaptation
Regular Funding
Program
ENABLING ACTIVITY (EA)
FUNDING modalities

Funding window A: Supporting the adaptation needs of Small Island Developing States (SIDS)

Funding window B: Strengthening technology transfer, innovation, and private sector engagement

Funding Sizes: 

  • Full-sized: > USD 5 million
  • Medium-sized: < USD 5 million
    A country cap is set at USD 20 million for a programming cycle

A longer-term and strategic arrangement of individual yet interlinked projects (child projects) that aim at achieving large-scale impacts on the global environment.

A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention.

Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
  • Direct access through countries for EAs up to USD 500,000
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies
Additional Support
  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Supports the development and design of project proposals.
  • Regional and global initiatives: Support activities and programmes at the regional and global level, including knowledge sharing and innovation.
  • Capacity-building support: Strengthens national institutions, focal points, and stakeholders, including through the Country Engagement Strategy and dedicated capacity-building programmes.

Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF)

The SCCF was established under the Convention in 2001 to finance activities, programs, and measures that help vulnerable developing countries (particularly the most vulnerable in Africa, Asia and the Small Island Developing States) to address the negative impacts of climate change. Since 2011, the SCCF has been tasked to provide resources to assist developing country Parties that are not least developed country Parties with their country-driven processes to advance NAPs

The SCCF supports in the following two priority areas:

  • Supporting the adaptation needs of Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
  • Strengthening technology transfer, innovation, and private sector engagement
CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Adaptation
FUNDING modalities

Funding window A: Supporting the adaptation needs of Small Island Developing States (SIDS)

Funding window B: Strengthening technology transfer, innovation, and private sector engagement

Funding Sizes: 

  • Full-sized: > USD 5 million
  • Medium-sized: < USD 5 million
    A country cap is set at USD 20 million for a programming cycle
Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
Additional Support
  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Funding provided to support preparation of a full-sized project (FSP) or medium-sized project (MSP). The amount of PPG that can be requested is proportional to the size of the project
FUNDING modalities

A longer-term and strategic arrangement of individual yet interlinked projects (child projects) that aim at achieving large-scale impacts on the global environment.

Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
FUNDING modalities

A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention.

Access types
  • Direct access through countries for EAs up to USD 500,000
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies

The SCCF focuses its support in two priority areas:

1. Supporting the adaptation needs of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) (Window A), including support in the following areas: 

  • storm and flood early warning systems
  • improved regional forecasts
  • nature-based solutions
  • enhanced resilience of roads, public infrastructure, and freshwater sources
  • climate-resilient aquaculture, fisheries, and diversified incomes
  • systemic resilience interventions in the food, urban and tourism space
  • resilience in key sectors such as energy and tourism
    coastal zone management
  • climate resilient health
  • measures to build resilience, reduce fragility, and diversify the local economy, reducing dependence on imports
  • mainstream climate resilience in policies and development planning
  • build domestic capacity for adaptation

2. Strengthening technology transfer, innovation, and private sector engagement (Window B), focusing on:

  • Multi-country, regional and global projects and programmes
  • Piloting and scaling innovative adaptation solutions
  • Challenge Program for Adaptation Innovation (catalytic grants for scalable innovation models)
  • NGI Program for Climate Adaptation (non-grant instruments such as guarantees, loans, and equity to mobilize private sector investment)
  • Deployment of technologies in new country contexts

The SCCF differentiates between two project sizes based on the contribution of the fund:

  • Full-sized projects (> USD 5 million)
  • Medium-sized projects (≤ USD 5 million)

A country cap for the Funding Window A (Adaptation support for SIDS) is set at USD 3 million (under a USD 200 million funding scenario; increasing to USD 5 million under a USD 300 million scenario).

In addition, the SCCF provides funding through two other modalities:

  • Enabling Activity (EA): A project for the preparation of a plan, strategy, or report to fulfill commitments under a convention.
  • Program: A longer-term and strategic arrangement of individual yet interlinked projects (child projects) that aim at achieving large-scale impacts on the global environment.

Additional funding beyond country caps is available through SCCF programs, including:

Window A:

  • Challenge Program for Adaptation Innovation
  • Regional and global projects and initiatives
  • Country Engagement Strategy
  • PrIA Capacity Building Program

Window B:

  • Challenge Program for Adaptation Innovation
  • NGI Program for Climate Adaptation
  • Regional and global projects and initiatives

Access to the SCCF is through one of the 18 GEF Agencies. The support for Enabling Activities (EA) is also possible through direct access, if the amount is up to USD 500,000. 

1. Under the priority area “Supporting the adaptation needs of Small Island Developing States (SIDS)” (Window A), eligible countries are SIDS that are developing country Parties to the Convention (UNFCCC), particularly those that are not classified as LDCs.

Window A is therefore limited to non-LDC SIDS.

2. Support under the priority area “Strengthening Technology Transfer, Innovation and Private Sector Engagement” (Window B) is provided to all developing countries that are Parties to the Convention (UNFCCC).

Window B is open to all eligible developing countries.

  • Grants (Window A)
  • Grants and non-grant instruments (Window B)

The LDCF and SCCF provide additional support to prepare projects, strengthen capacity, and support countries in implementing adaptation priorities under the UNFCCC.

  • Project Preparation Grant (PPG): Supports the development and design of project proposals.
  • Enabling Activities (EA): Support the preparation of plans, strategies, and reports (e.g. NAPAs, NAPs) to fulfill Convention commitments.
  • Regional and global initiatives: Support activities and programmes at the regional and global level, including knowledge sharing and innovation.
  • Capacity-building support: Strengthens national institutions, focal points, and stakeholders, including through the Country Engagement Strategy and dedicated capacity-building programmes.

Eligibility: 

  • LDCF: Least Developed Countries only
  • SCCF: All developing countries, with a focus on technology and innovation

Process for accessing GEF, LDCF, and SCCF funding: Projects are developed and submitted by accredited GEF Agencies in consultation with recipient countries, following a common GEF project cycle.

For medium-sized projects, the GEF Agency may choose between a one-step or two-step approval process, while full-sized projects (FSPs) follow a two-step process involving Council approval and CEO endorsement.

Development of a Project Concept
Development of a Project Concept (Two-step approach)

Description:

A GEF Agency prepares a project concept at the request of and in consultation with relevant country institutions and other relevant partners using the Project Identification Form (PIF)

Actors involved:

GEF Agency

1
Development of a Project Concept
Submission of PIF to the GEF Secretariat
Submission of PIF to the GEF Secretariat (Two-step approach)

Description:

The Agency submits PIFs to the Secretariat on a rolling basis, copying other Agencies, STAP, and the relevant Convention Secretariats.

A letter of Endorsement by the respective GEF Operational Focal Point has to be attached.

Actors involved: 

GEF Agency

GEF Operational Focal Point

2
Submission of PIF to the GEF Secretariat
Review of the PIF
Review of the PIF (Two-step approach)

Description:

Secretariat reviews each eligible PIF. Other Agencies and Convention Secretariats submit any comments to the Secretariat and the Agency. If a PIF does not meet the conditions for approval, the Secretariat either rejects it or requests additional information

Actors involved: 

GEF Secretariat

3
Review of the PIF
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF (Two-step approach)

Description:

Following receipt of the Secretariat’s comments, the Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF, if necessary

Actors involved: 

GEF Agency

4
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised PIF
Approval by the CEO
Approval by the CEO (Two-step approach)

Description:

Once the Secretariat determines that the project proposal meets the conditions for approval, the CEO decides whether to include it in a Work Program

Actors involved:

GEF CEO

GEF Secretariat STAP 

5
Approval by the CEO
Development of a MSP Approval Request
Development of a MSP Approval Request

Two-step approach: After PIF approval, and before the deadline for submission of a complete approval request, the Agency prepares and

One-step approach: A GEF Agency prepares a MSP Approval Request at the request of and in consultation with relevant country institutions and other relevant partners.

Actors involved:

GEF Agency

6
Development of a MSP Approval Request
Submission of the MSP
Submission of the MSP

Two-step approach: The Agency submits the MSP Approval Request to the Secretariat for review on a rolling basis. A letter of Endorsement by the respective GEF Operational Focal Point has to be attached.

One-step approach: The Agency submits MSP Approval Request to the Secretariat on a rolling basis. A letter of Endorsement by the respective GEF Operational Focal Point has to be attached.

Actors involved: 

GEF Council

7
Submission of the MSP
Review of the MSP
Review of the MSP

Two-step approach: The Secretariat reviews the MSP Approval Request for consistency with the approved PIF

One-step approach: The Secretariat reviews the MSP Approval Request. If a MSP Approval Request does not meet the conditions for approval, the Secretariat either rejects it or requests additional information.

Actors involved: 

GEF Secretariat

8
Review of the MSP
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP

Description:

Following receipt of the Secretariat’s comments, the Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP Approval Request, if necessary

Actors involved: 

GEF Agency

9
Agency responds to any comments and submits a revised MSP
CEO Approval
CEO Approval

Description:

Once the Secretariat determines that a project proposal meets the conditions for approval, the GEF CEO decides whether to approve the MSP.

Actors involved: 

GEF CEO

10
CEO Approval
Approval by the Agency
Approval by the Agency

Description:

The Agency approves the project following its own internal procedures and begins project implementation.

Actors involved:

GEF Agency

11
Approval by the Agency

Different portals provide a good overview on ongoing and past projects of the respective fund. 

  • Projects: List of GEF, LDCF and SCCF projects

Focal Points | GEF : National Focal Points for the multilateral climate funds.

Climate Investment Funds (CIF)

The Climate Investments Funds (CIF) were established in 2008 and comprise two funds: the Clean Technology Fund (CTF) and the Strategic Climate Fund (SCF). Through specific programmes, the funds support the design of multi-project investment plans that work across multiple interfacing sectors.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Mitigation
Mitigation and Adaptation​
clean Technology fund (ctf)
strategic climate fund (scf)
FUNDING programmes

Programmes:

  • Accelerating Coal Transition (ACT)
  • Industry Decarbonization Programme
  • Renewable Energy Integration Program (REI)
  • Dedicated Private Sector Program (DPSP)

Programmes:

  • Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR)
  • Forest Investment Program (FIP)
  • Scaling Up Renewable Energy Program in Low Income Countries (SREP)
  • Renewable Energy Integration Program (REI) Nature, People and Climate (NPC)
  • CIF Accelerating Resilience Investments and Innovations for Sustainable Economies (ARISE).”

Dedicated Grant Mechanism Provides direct grant support to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC), delivered through the FIP and NPC Programmes

Access types
  • Through MDBs (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, IDB, IFC and World Bank
  • Direct access by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC)

Climate Investment Funds (CIF)

The Climate Investments Funds (CIF) were established in 2008 and comprise two funds: the Clean Technology Fund (CTF) and the Strategic Climate Fund (SCF). Through specific programmes, the funds support the design of multi-project investment plans that work across multiple interfacing sectors.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Mitigation
FUNDING modalities

Programmes:

  • Accelerating Coal Transition (ACT)
  • Global Energy Storage Program (GESP)
  • Industry Decarbonization Programme
  • Dedicated Private Sector Program (DPSP) / Futures Window
  • Renewable Energy Integration Program (REI)
Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Mitigation and Adaptation​
FUNDING modalities

Programmes:

  • Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR)
  • Forest Investment Program (FIP)
  • Scaling Up Renewable Energy Program in Low Income Countries (SREP)
  • Renewable Energy Integration Program (REI) Nature, People and Climate (NPC)

Dedicated Grant Mechanism Provides direct grant support to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC), delivered through the FIP and NPC Programmes

Access types
  • Direct access by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC)

The Climate Investment Funds comprise two main funds: the Clean Technology Fund (CTF) and the Strategic Climate Fund (SCF).

1. The Clean Technology Fund (CTF)

The CTF finances low-carbon technologies in developing countries with significant potential to scale up, mobilise private investment, and support low-carbon development. 

Key investment areas include:

  • Power sector: renewable energy, energy efficiency (generation, transmission, distribution, end-use), and energy storage
  • Transport: modal shifts to public transport, improved fuel efficiency, and fuel switching
  • Buildings and industry: large-scale adoption of energy-efficient technologies and demand-side management
  • Emerging areas: industry decarbonization, clean technology supply chains, and coal transition
2. Strategic Climate Fund (SCF)

The SCF provides financing to pilot and scale-up innovative approaches addressing specific climate change challenges or sectoral responses.

It aims to:

  • Move from piloting to scaling up climate action across key sectors, including nature, resilience, urban, and energy
  • Channel new and additional financing for climate change mitigation and adaptation
  • Provide incentives for scaled-up and transformational action aligned with sustainable development

The funding amount available per country varies between the different programs.

Access to the CIFs and its various programmes is through six MDBs (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, IDB, IFC, and World Bank)

Eligibility to access funds depends on the specific programme and may vary.is determined through the CIF Country Selection Process.

Countries must generally:

  • be eligible for Official Development Assistance (ODA)
  • have an active lending programme with at least one CIF partner MDB (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, IDB, IFC, World Bank)

Additional criteria may apply depending on the programme.

For the Dedicated Private Sector Program (DPSP):

  • access is limited to CIF countries, i.e. countries already participating in CIF programmes (e.g. with approved investment plans or selected under other CIF initiatives)
  • Grants and Contingent Grants 
  • Concessional and market-rate loans
  • Equity
  • Guarantees

 N/A

Call for Expression of Interest
Call for Expression of Interest

Description:

The CIF Secretariat issues a call for Expression of Interest for a CIF program.

Interested countries and their MDB partners must check the eligibility criteria.

Actors involved:

CIF Secretariat

1
Call for Expression of Interest
Expression of Interest
Expression of Interest

Description:

Eligible countries partner with MDBs prepares and submits their Expression of Interest to participate in a specific CIF program

Actors involved: 

Country
MDB

2
Expression of Interest
Evaluation and selection
Evaluation and selection

Description:

An independent Expert Group evaluates all submissions against pre-defined criteria and make a recommendation on country selection

Actors involved: 

Independent Expert Group

3
Evaluation and selection
Decision by CIF governing body
Decision by CIF governing body

Description:

The CIF governing body makes the final decision

Actors involved: 

CIF governing body

4
Decision by CIF governing body
Development of investment plan
Development of investment plan

Description:

Selected countries with their MDB partners prepare an investment plan providing initial examples of projects

Actors involved:

Country
MDB

5
Development of investment plan
Endorsement
Endorsement

Description:

The CIF governing body reviews the Investment plan against the criteria of the CIF investment program and endorses it where appropriate

Actors involved: 

CIF governing body

6
Endorsement

Different portals provide a good overview on ongoing and past projects of the respective fund. 

Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD)

The Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) was established in 2022 under the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement to provide financial support to developing countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change. The Fund supports countries to respond to economic and non-economic losses and damages associated with extreme weather events and slow-onset climate impacts especially through country-led and country-owned approaches. Its initial operational phase is being implemented through the Barbados Implementation Modalities (BIM), which provide grant-based financing for eligible activities, projects, and programmes.

The Fund is governed by a 26-member Board and is hosted in the Philippines, with the World Bank serving as interim trustee and an independent Secretariat supporting its operations.

Priority recipients are developing countries particularly vulnerable to climate change, with ≥50% of BIM resources reserved for SIDS and LDCs.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Responding to economic and non-economic loss and damage
Funding programme: BARBADOS IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES (BIM)​

Funding size

  • Total BIM allocation: USD 342 million
  • Funding requests: USD 5–20 million per funding request
  • At least 50% allocated to SIDS and LDCs during the start-up phase

Eligible activities

  • Responding to climate-induced extreme weather events
  • National loss and damage response activities
  • Budget support for policies and programmes responding to loss and damage
  • Economic and non-economic losses and damages
Access types
  • Direct Budget Support through National Governments
  • Access through Accredited Access Entitties: Adaptation Fund, GCF. and GEF
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT
  • Technical Assistance (Santiago Network): Provides technical expertise to help countries assess and respond to loss and damage.

  • Country Support System (under development): Will support countries in preparing funding requests and strengthening national capacities.

Climate Investment Funds (CIF)

The Climate Investments Funds (CIF) were established in 2008 and comprise two funds: the Clean Technology Fund (CTF) and the Strategic Climate Fund (SCF). Through specific programmes, the funds support the design of multi-project investment plans that work across multiple interfacing sectors.

CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Mitigation
FUNDING modalities

Programmes:

  • Accelerating Coal Transition (ACT)
  • Global Energy Storage Program (GESP)
  • Industry Decarbonization Programme
  • Dedicated Private Sector Program (DPSP) / Futures Window
  • Renewable Energy Integration Program (REI)
Access types
  • Through one of the 18 GEF Agencies (ADB, AfDB, EBRD, FAO, IDB, IFAD, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, WBG, CI, CAF, DBSA, FECO, FUNBIO, IUCN, BOAD, WWF)
CLIMATE OBJECTIVE:
Mitigation and Adaptation​

Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD)

The Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) was established in 2022 under the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement to provide financial support to developing countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change. The Fund supports countries to respond to economic and non-economic losses and damages associated with extreme weather events and slow-onset climate impacts especially through country-led and country-owned approaches. Its initial operational phase is being implemented through the Barbados Implementation Modalities (BIM), which provide grant-based financing for eligible activities, projects, and programmes.

The Fund is governed by a 26-member Board and is hosted in the Philippines, with the World Bank serving as interim trustee and an independent Secretariat supporting its operations.

Priority recipients are developing countries particularly vulnerable to climate change, with ≥50% of BIM resources reserved for SIDS and LDCs.

FUNDING modalities

Programmes:

  • Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR)
  • Forest Investment Program (FIP)
  • Scaling Up Renewable Energy Program in Low Income Countries (SREP)
  • Renewable Energy Integration Program (REI) Nature, People and Climate (NPC)

Dedicated Grant Mechanism Provides direct grant support to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC), delivered through the FIP and NPC Programmes

Access types
  • Direct access by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC)

The FRLD provides support to particularly vulnerable developing countries in addressing both economic and non-economic loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of climate change. Its scope covers responses to extreme weather events and slow-onset processes, including climate-related emergencies, sea-level rise, displacement, relocation, migration, and climate-resilient recovery and reconstruction.

The Fund aims to address priority gaps in the existing climate finance landscape by providing complementary and additional support that improves the speed and adequacy of access to finance. Support may range from immediate post-disaster assistance and long-term recovery efforts to the development of national response plans, strengthening climate information and data systems, and promoting equitable, safe, and dignified human mobility.

Under the BIM, countries can submit funding requests of USD 5 million to USD 20 million per activity, project, or programme. BIM is the Fund’s start-up phase (2025–2026) and serves as the initial operational mechanism through which the FRLD is testing its funding procedures and making resources available to vulnerable developing countries.

Funding Amounts

  • USD 5–20 million per funding request
  • USD 342 million BIM funding envelope (2025–2026)
  • ≥50% of resources reserved for SIDS and LDCs

The current operational start-up modality is the Barbados Implementation Modalities (BIM), with the duration of 15.12.2025 – 15.06.2026. The FRLD does not yet have multiple established financing windows.

Barbados Implementation Modalities (BIM)

  • Initial operational funding modality of the FRLD
  • Established to launch the Fund’s first funding cycle (2025–2026)
  • Provides grant-based financing for loss and damage response activities, projects, and programmes
  • Total BIM envelope: USD 250 million, with no fixed country allocation
  • At least 50% of resources reserved for SIDS and LDCs

Countries may access BIM funds through direct budget support to national governments or through eligible access entities accredited to the Adaptation Fund (AF), Green Climate Fund (GCF), or Global Environment Facility (GEF).

Eligible recipients are developing countries particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change. Under BIM, at least 50% of resources are allocated to SIDS and LDCs.

  • Grants for the Barbados Implementation Modalities (BIM)
  • For the long term operations, the Fund may deploy a range of additional financial instruments that take into consideration debt sustainability (grants, highly concessional loans, guarantees, direct budget support and policy-based finance, equity, insurance mechanisms, risk-sharing mechanisms, pre-arranged finance, performance-based programmes and other financial products, as appropriate) to augment and complement national resources for addressing loss and damage:

Technical Assistance through the Santiago Network on Loss and Damage
The Santiago Network connects developing countries with organizations, experts, and technical service providers that can help assess, avert, minimize, and address loss and damage. Assistance is provided upon request and delivered through a network of technical organizations and experts. Support may include loss and damage assessments, risk analysis, data and information systems, policy and planning support, institutional strengthening, and technical studies.

Country Support System (under development)
The FRLD is developing a Country Support System to help eligible countries identify priorities, strengthen institutional capacities, develop national loss and damage strategies, and prepare funding requests to the Fund. Intended to support country readiness, planning, and preparation of funding requests.

Develop a Funding Request
Develop a Funding Request

​Description:

Develop a funding request under the Barbados Implementation Modalities (BIM) that addresses country priorities for responding to climate-related loss and damage.

Requests may be submitted through:

  • Direct Budget Support via the national government; or
  • An eligible access entity (e.g., entities accredited to the Adaptation Fund, GCF, or GEF).

 

Applicants prepare their submission using the official BIM Funding Request Template and supporting guidance.

Actors involved: 

Country

1
Develop a Funding Request
Country Endorsement
Country Endorsement

Description:

The funding request must be endorsed by the authorized government representative designated by the recipient country, e.g., country focal point. The endorsement confirms country ownership and alignment with national priorities for responding to loss and damage.

Actors involved:

National Focal Point or national authority

2
Country Endorsement
Submission of Funding Request
Submission of Funding Request

Description:

Submit the completed funding request to the FRLD Secretariat during an active BIM call for funding requests .Funding requests must comply with BIM eligibility, funding, and documentation requirements.

Actors involved: 

Country
Access entity, where applicable
FRLD Secretariat

3
Submission of Funding Request
Technical Assessment
Technical Assessment

Description:

The Secretariat assesses funding requests against the BIM eligibility criteria, funding criteria, and assessment methodology. Additional information or revisions may be requested.

Actors involved: 

FRLD Secretariat
BIM Delivery Team

4
Technical Assessment
Funding Approval
Funding Approval

Description:

Eligible funding requests are considered according to the BIM assessment and approval process. Funding requests are considered for approval according to the Board-approved BIM governance and decision-making arrangements.

Actors involved:

FRLD Board
MDB

5
Funding Approval
Legal Arrangements and Disbursement
Legal Arrangements and Disbursement

Description:

Following approval, legal and financial arrangements are finalized and funds are disbursed in accordance with the approved funding request and Fund requirements.

Actors involved: 

Interim Trustee
Country or access entity

6
Legal Arrangements and Disbursement

FRLD is currently in its start-up phase and has not yet approved a portfolio of projects or programmes. The first Call for Funding Requests under the Barbados Implementation Modalities (BIM) opened on 15 December 2025 and closes on 15 June 2026. Approved projects are expected to emerge following the first funding cycle.